37 year "marriage" annulled in Mississippi
After 37 years of marriage and rearing four children, the wife files for divorce. Husband responds with a claim of annulment, saying he and his wife were never legally married given she failed to divorce her first husband. Sound crazy. Well, it happened in a Desoto County Chancery Court and the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down its decision in this case this week.
In Cotton v. Cotton, the Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed a decision concerning property division in an annulled marriage. The Chancellor granted the annulment because the wife was never legally divorced from her first husband, who she married at 16, and therefore her marriage to her current spouse, at age 23, was void. Despite the fact that the couple had lived as husband and wife for 37 years and raised four children, their marriage legally never occurred. Harsh? Not really.
In Mississippi, the Mississippi Code Sec. 93-7-1 states that a person may obtain an annulment of the marriage, as opposed to divorce, if the following causes existed on the date of the marriage:
1. Incurable impotency;
2. Insanity;
3. Failure to meet licensure requirements, if there has been no cohabitation;
4. Incapacity to consent due to age or lack of understanding;
5. Physical incapacity to enter into the marriage state;
6. Consent obtained by force or fraud; or
7. The wife was pregnant by another on the date of the marriage without husband's knowledge.
For grounds 4 through 7, the suit for annulment must be brought within six months of the time the ground is or should have been discovered. For ground 2 above, the suit must be brought within six months from the date of the marriage.
However, bigamous or incestuous marriages are void marriages and may be annulled at any time. This is how after 37 years of marriage, Mr. Cotton was able to obtain an annulment given Ms. Cotton had not divorced her previous husband at the time she married Mr. Cotton.
Why, after 37 years of marriage, would the husband ask for an annulment as opposed to agreeing to a divorce? Well, the answer appears to be money. The husband argued that given there never was a marriage, the couple's property should not be equitably divided as is required in the case of married couple's divorcing. The Court did not rule on the issue of the annulment as the wife failed to raise the issue in cross-appeal. The husband only appealed the court's division of the property. In my next post, I will discuss the court's ruling concerning the division of the property in a void marriage.
Mississippi attorney Robert Kisselburgh represents clients in divorces throughout the state of Mississippi. If you have questions or would like to discuss your case, contact us at 877-601-4040, 601-936-4040, or contact us online.
