October 28, 2009

Child Support in Mississippi based on Adjusted Gross Income, not Gross Income

Mississippi Court reverses Chancellor for not making deductions before calculating child support

The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed a Jones County Chancellor for failing to make the statutory deductions from the non-custodial parent's gross income before calculating the child support owed. In Holloway v. Holloway, the Chancellor failed to make any deductions from the husband's gross income before making a determination of what he owed in monthly child support. Mississippi Code Section 43-19-101(3)(b) is explicit that certain mandatory deductions are subtracted from a non-custodial parent's gross income before calculating child support owed. In this case, the Chancellor failed to make any deductions for taxes paid, so the amount of child support awarded was based on his gross income, not his adjusted gross income.

It is difficult to understand what the Chancellor was thinking in this case as making the mandatory deductions from the gross income before calculating the child support owed is a rather elementary situation.

Reported by: Robert M. Kisselburgh, Mississippi Divorce Attorney

October 18, 2009

Casinos collecting child support from winners in Colorado

New law authorizes casinos to collect child support from winners

Colorado enacted a new law that requires casinos to do a computer check of any person winning more than $1,200. If they are delinquent, the money goes to the state as opposed to the unhappy gambler. It is about time! Colorado, according to the article, collected over $320 million last year in back child support through this new law. Hopefully, Mississippi will enact a similar law.

Information provided by: Robert Kisselburgh, Mississippi Divorce Attorney

Jackpot.jpg

October 14, 2009

Facebook poke violates protective order

Tennessee woman faces contempt for Facebook "poke"

A 36-year-old Tennessee woman was arrested and charged with violating a protective order that prohibited her from "telephoning, contacting or otherwise communicating with the petitioner." How did she violate the order? It seems she "poked" the other petitioner on Facebook. According to Facebook, if you "poke" someone, they will receive a poke alert on their home page. According to the article, her attorney says she was surprised that a "poke" violated the order. I guess she has a hard time understanding what "contacting" means. It is rather apparent if you "poke" someone on Facebook, you are contacting them. Good luck at her contempt hearing.

Information provided by: Robert Kisselburgh, Mississippi Divorce Attorney

facebook.jpg

October 1, 2009

Texas judge clears way for two gay men to divorce

Texas judge declares same-sex marriage ban violates equal protection clause

Texas, just as Mississippi, has a ban on gay marriage. In Texas, voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and the Texas Family Code also prohibits such unions. However, a Dallas, Texas district court judge found the prohibition violates the equal protection clause to the Constitution and paved the way for two gay men to divorce. The judge held the court "has jurisdiction to hear a suit for divorce filed by person legally married in another jurisdiction." The attorney general said he would appeal the decision. The Texas Supreme Court will most likely reverse this ruling, but you can expect the case to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court based on a violation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Source: Dallas Morning News

Reported by Robert Kisselburgh, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer

Dallas-Texas-Skyline.jpg