April 19, 2009

Dividing debts in a Mississippi divorce--who is liable?

Liability for marital debts when you divorce in Mississippi

In a recent Los Angeles Times article, the author gave some good tips to couples dividing debts during a divorce. The overriding concern and point that should be reiterated is that just because you and your spouse agree that one of you will be responsible for a debt, it does not change the relationship with your creditor. Here is an example.

A Madison County, Mississippi couple are divorcing and have joint credit cards with American Express and Visa. The husband agrees to take on the American Express payments while the wife agrees to pay the Visa bill. After the divorce, things don't go well for the husband and he defaults on his payments to American Express. American Express goes after the wife for payment. She says how can that be? Well, if she was a joint account holder on the card at the time the debt was accumulated, then she is jointly liable for those debts. She probably has an agreement from her husband to indemnify her (standard in a divorce), but that indemnification agreement means nothing to the creditor. American Express must be paid and the wife will be jointly responsible. While she can then go after the husband for the money, if he does not have it, the indemnification agreement does not do her much good.

Lessons learned?

1. When divorcing, you need to ensure that you are aware of all debt accumulated during your marriage.

2. If you have joint credit cards, cancel the joint cards.

3. If there are balances on those cards, make sure one spouse opens up an account to transfer the balance to so it is no longer a joint debt or pays off the debt.

4. As for other jointly-held debt, such as mortgages and automobiles, you need to refinance the debt if possible. Those lenders will enforce their original agreement where both of you agreed to pay the debt even if your divorce decree says one spouse is responsible for payment.

I spoke about this issue before in a previous post. If you find yourself contemplating a divorce, call the Kisselburgh Law Firm at 601-936-4040 or contact us online to set up a consultation to discuss your rights.

iStock_000004652423XSmall.jpg

April 10, 2009

Husband says ex-wife owes mortgage balloon payment; Court rules otherwise

Understand a divorce property settlement agreement before you sign it

This week the Mississippi Court of Appeals sided with a Madison County Chancellor who ruled a husband was responsible for paying a balloon payment on the divorced couple's mortgage. The case highlights the importance of being represented by an attorney when divorcing and also making sure you understand the documents you sign.

When the couple divorced, the husband agreed to pay alimony in the amount of the monthly mortgage payments "until such time as the mortgage on the property ... is fully satisfied." To ensure payments, he also agreed to provide a life insurance policy in the amount of $150,000. The tricky part was the mortgage contained a balloon clause. At the end of the mortgage term, a final payment of $142,268.41 payment was due. When it came due, the husband claimed he did not owe it.

A hearing was held and the Chancellor ruled in favor of the wife. The husband appealed. The Mississippi Court of Appeals sided with the chancellor. The question came down to whether the dissolution agreement was ambiguous or not. In Mississippi, as in many other states, a divorce property settlement agreement is a contract between the parties. The Court will look to the document for its intent unless the contract is ambiguous. In this case, the Court found that although one provision was ambiguous, the agreement provided the husband would pay the mortgage until it was "fully satisfied." The mortgage could not be "fully satisfied" unless the final balloon payment was made. Further, by the husband agreeing to provide a life insurance policy for the value of the house, it showed his intent to be obligated for the full amount of the mortgage. As the Court of Appeals stated, "it would be nonsensical for [the husband] to voluntarily obligate himself to obtain life insurance for the full amount due under the mortgage if he were not intending to obligate himself for this amount."

Let me repeat an important lesson. The wife was represented by an attorney who drafted the dissolution agreement, but the husband represented himself in the divorce. Too many times I receive calls from folks who did not have representation at the time of their divorce and are now calling to say there did not realize they were obligated to do certain things. At the Kisselburgh Law Firm, we represent those going through divorces. If you are contemplating a divorce, call us at 601-936-4040 or contact us online to set up a consultation to discuss your rights.